Home    About    Contact     Links     Work     CV                    



Professor E. Mendoza

"Did computer generated 'high-entropy essays' have a life after 1968?"
Brent MacGregor, 2002.


by the uncertainty relation metal fermions form the dirac delta function
by permutation antisymmetrical waves have a mean free path using the Mathieus equation
by the uncertainty relation functions electrons occupy all energies in insulators
in periodic lattices atomic vibrations are transformed with energy kt 2
by anology quantized waves are transported at every lattice vector
always degrees of freedom are conserved along lattice directions
therefore electrons produce electron-phonon interactions
in solids photons interact via Umklapp processes
and sometimes photons are reflected with velocity c
in the 19th century Rayleigh and Jeans failed to explain the Rydberg constant
in 1869 Lorentz found electrons baffling phenomenologically
in the 19th century Lorentz explained solids mathematically
in 1928 Debye found a solution in terms of standing waves
in 1928 Debye worked out the lattice modes
recently Debye found a solution with this in mind


High-Entropy Essays were part of Cybernetic Serendipity at the ICA, London, 1968 along with
COMPUTERIZED HAIKU. They are frankly bogus physics essays.

Hardly anyone remembers High-Entropy Essays now. This is a sad thing. They are the forerunner of  all the computer
texts that have tried to pass as human-authored.  However, Mendoza's subterfuge was quickly discovered. This happened about 1962.
Professor Mendoza tells the story:

"You might also be interested to know the origin of this work. Professor Flowers (no less)  had a theory
that students never actually learned any real ideas; all they learned was a vocabulary  of okay words which  they strung
together in arbitrary order,  relying on the fact that an examiner pressed for time would not actually read what they had written
but would scan down the pages looking  for those words...The end point was when a colleague from another university secretly
sent me some first year examination papers a week or so before the exam, and I wrote suitable vocabularies (without cheating)
and copied down what the computer emitted... the script was slipped in among the genuine ones.  Unfortunately it was marked
by a very conscientious man who eventually stormed into the Director's office shouting "Who the hell is this man, why did we ever
admit him? So perhaps Professor Flowers' hypothesis was incorrect."

The original program is lost. Mendoza published some of the High-Entropy Essays. He also published a flow chart of the program.
This is what I used when I came to program my version. However, these two (mine and his) groups of essays differ slightly.
When I have time I'll try to reverse-engineer Mendoza's essays to work back to how he made them.

Wayne Clements