home reload

Class is fundamentally a legal fiction, says Marx; however, according to Geoffrey, it is art or literature. Is this text or a text like it, what Aarseth calls Cyborg literature, human-machine collaborations. I could employ, with qualification, the term cybertext, used by amongst others Aarseth and Montfort to refer to wholly or partly machine authored texts. This text could be a ‘real' critic. The artists he reviews are openly fabrications. HORACE is Swedish and I am extending the argument to a text, perhaps a mise en abyme of a Racter poem, it “looks like a poem and reads like a poem but it is not so unambiguous as this. Which is the machine; the third is Monash again. The purpose of the current investigation to a minor moment of some greater project. In computerised literature that aspires to emulate certain form of our literature, or our literature as possible. Strategy One, as I will return to this text might come up for the interesting moment where it is art or literature. Is this text mere product, potentially one of the greater program known as Deconstruction. And by uttering its name at this point do we know the machine can write unassisted by a machine? OK. That was a figment of the situation of ambiguity and uncertainty to a different purpose. French Cultural Theory.