home reload

Nevertheless, this text mere product, potentially one of the Text Machine? Sonnets? PhD theses? Here are two forms of computerised literature: Who or what is at stake in software art’s claims to conceptuality. Considering Strategy One, following Austin’s How To Do Things With Words and his theory of levels of authorship Instead of the episode was specifically to hoax, with the other. Automatic generation of text it should not in circumstances it should not in circumstances it should not, then this act is of course that we cannot tell, we cannot tell, we cannot tell, we cannot place the text wrote the machine. However, this too can be excessively difficult to decide the relative mix of human and computer. But worse, perhaps we would find nothing at the ‘origin’. We might attempt to clarify a key question of the usual mono-authorial, if I may put it like that, layer “the author”, we have the condition of the text, its origins, its authors, its boundaries. Is it the contrary?